Commercial Surveys

Commercial Surveys

Analysis of Structural Barriers to Electric Vehicle Development in Iran: An Integrated Governance Perspective

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor at the Institute for Trade Studies and Research
2 Researcher at the Institute for Trade Studies and Research
Abstract
The development of high-tech industries in Iran, particularly the electric vehicle (EV) industry, is constrained by institutional, policy, and techno-economic barriers rooted in weak integrated governance. This study adopts a quantitative descriptive-survey approach to identify, prioritize, and analyze the structural barriers to EV development in Iran and to identify the requirements for integrated governance. The study population consisted of managers, experts, and specialists in the automotive, energy, supply chain, and policymaking sectors. A total of 67 participants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire comprising nine independent variables and 36 items. Its validity was confirmed using the Delphi method and the CVR and CVI indices. Data were analyzed through multivariate regression modeling. The findings classified the structural barriers into two broad categories: institutional challenges (institutional fragmentation, contradictory policies, infrastructure gaps, and lack of value chain integration) and techno-economic challenges (energy supply-demand imbalance, weak key technologies, financing constraints, and the assembly trap). The results indicate that energy supply-demand imbalance and technological weaknesses exert the strongest direct effects. However, the underlying causes lie in institutional fragmentation and fragmented governance, where contradictory policies and institutional fragmentation create the conditions for techno-economic crises and lock the automotive industry into an assembly trap. The study identifies three fundamental prerequisites for integrated governance: a single cross-sectoral coordinating authority, an integrated long-term national strategy, and a transition from an assembly-based model to an integrated value chain. Redefining the governance structure is a necessary prerequisite for any technology development strategy or industrial investment in this sector.
Keywords
Subjects

 
Electric Mobility in public transportation, A Guidebook for Asia-Pacific Countries, (2023). ESCAP.
Barakat, S., Guven, A. F., Abdelaziz, A. Y., & Samy, M. M. (2026). A comprehensive review of electric vehicles and sustainable urban mobility in the Middle East and North Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews225, 116154.
Griffiths, S., Uratani, J. M., Evensen, D., & Sovacool, B. K. (2026). Electric momentum? Catalyzing electric vehicle adoption in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Cleaner Production543, 147509.
Mustafa, S., Shi, Y., Adan, D. E., Luo, W., & Al Humdan, E. (2026). Role of environmental awareness & self-identification expressiveness in electric-vehicle adoption. Transportation53(2), 861-885.
Mhatre, A. S., & Shukla, P. (2026). A comprehensive review of energy harvesting technologies for sustainable electric vehicles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research33(6), 2079-2102.
International Energy Agency. (2025). Global EV Outlook 2024. https://www.iea.org
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429.
Chen, J., Wang, X., & Li, Y. (2024). A systematic review of technological innovation systems in electric vehicle industry: Cross-country analysis. Energy Policy, 185, 113954.
Fartash, K., Ghorbani, A., & Bagheri, M. (2023). Slow adoption of EVs under a weak policy regime: Future scenarios of EVs development and diffusion in Iran. Futures, 151, 103196.
Funke, S. A., Günther, M., & Plötz, P. (2019). The role of public charging infrastructure for electric vehicle adoption in Germany. Nature Energy, 4(11), 933-940.
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Research Policy, 40(4), 494-509.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). Global EV Outlook 2024. IEA Publications.
Kashan, M., et al. (2021). Co-evolution of dynamic capability and knowledge development: from car assembly to luxury car innovation in the Iranian auto industry. Innovation and Development, 13(1), 51-75.
Liu, X., Xue, C., & Xie, F. (2024). The impact of policy mix characteristics of multi-level governance on innovation output of the new energy vehicle industry in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(8), 1161-1174.
Muratori, M., Alexander, M., & Arent, D. (2021). The intersection of electric vehicles and the grid: A review of challenges and opportunities. Progress in Energy, 3(4), 042002.
Oryani, B., et al. (2021). Heterogeneous preferences for EVs: Evidence from Iran. Renewable Energy, 181, 675-689.
Qian, L., Liu, M., & Yang, C. (2026). Impact of government policies on the electric vehicle industry, environment, and society: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Technology in Society, 84, 102518.
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 11-19.
Volume 23, Issue 135 - Serial Number 135
January and February 2026
Pages 55-72

  • Receive Date 11 May 2026
  • Revise Date 20 June 2026
  • Accept Date 21 June 2026